Part of our law-firm search visibility guide. For the workflow behind this advice, see our approach to discovery research.
A recommendation is an observation, not a placement
You cannot book a position in an AI answer through an optimization checklist. A more useful starting point is a record of what an engine actually says about a defined client question. Does it name the firm? Link to it? Describe the practice correctly? These are different observations.
For a family practice, compare an unbranded question about complex divorce with a branded question about the firm's services. The first tests discovery. The second helps inspect understanding. Do not combine them into a single success number.
Build evidence around the practice
Choose one service page and read it as a prospective client. Can you identify the jurisdiction, the type of matter, the person handling it, and the consultation process? Replace vague claims of excellence with verifiable details. Link a relevant lawyer biography and useful publications where they exist.
Review genuine third-party profiles for conflicting names or outdated services. This is information quality work, not a claim that every directory listing affects ChatGPT.
Check access, then repeat the observation
OpenAI documents OAI-SearchBot as its search crawler, separately from GPTBot. Ask whoever manages the site to inspect both robots directives and infrastructure access. An allowed crawler is not a guaranteed recommendation.
Keep a dated record of the original question, engine, answer, and sources. After publishing a reviewed improvement, repeat the same checks alongside new questions. Report the edit and the later observation separately.
Questions worth asking
Should we mention ChatGPT repeatedly on our service pages?
No. Write for the client who needs the service. A page about severance should explain severance consultations, not repeat optimization keywords.
Does a citation mean an endorsement?
No. Record a source link separately from a named recommendation and from positive language.
Sources & scope
Platform documentation below supports the technical context. The suggested workflows and examples are our editorial recommendations, not claims of measured customer results or access to private ranking systems.
OpenAI: crawler controlsContinue the investigation
- How ChatGPT Chooses Which Lawyers to Recommend
- How to Audit Your Law Firm's Visibility Across ChatGPT, Gemini and Google
- Schema Markup for Law Firms in the Age of AI Search
Make the method concrete: explore an example visibility report. The tool is a demonstration, not a live audit.